Article Summary
Points farming has emerged as a widespread phenomenon in the cryptocurrency industry. As of 2024, over 115 billion points have been distributed across various protocols. Points farming refers to users completing specific tasks on a protocol to accumulate points or rewards, blending elements of airdrops and liquidity mining.
Key Insights:
- Hybrid Strategy: Combines "bait-and-hook" tactics—protocols use airdrops as bait to attract users while points act as hooks to maintain engagement.
- Pioneers: Platforms like Blur (NFT marketplace, 2022) and Friend.tech (SocialFi, 2023) popularized points programs, leading to their adoption across DeFi, wallets, and DEXs.
Pros & Cons:
- Users: Opportunity for rewards but face information asymmetry and uncertain ROI.
- Protocols: Effective for growth but risk sustainability if airdrops disappoint expectations.
Case Studies:
- Friend.tech: Leveraged SocialFi hype but faced declining activity post-airdrop due to technical issues and transfer restrictions.
- EigenLayer: TVL surged to $150B with points farming but community criticized token lockups and limited distribution.
- Future: Points may evolve into loyalty programs, but trust and real value creation remain critical for long-term success.
1. Introduction
Points farming has become a staple marketing tool in Web3, mirroring loyalty programs from traditional sectors. In blockchain, it merges the allure of airdrops with the engagement mechanics of liquidity mining, creating a dynamic but speculative ecosystem.
Characteristics of Points Programs:
- No intrinsic value: Points derive worth from anticipated airdrops.
- Chain-off storage: Managed internally by protocols, not on-chain.
- Flexible criteria: Protocols control task requirements and reward timelines.
2. Points Farming Landscape
2.1 Growth and Adoption
- 115B+ points distributed by 2024 across DeFi, NFTs, and SocialFi.
- Blur’s success: Overtook OpenSea in NFT volume using points-to-airdrop conversions.
- Derivative platforms: Whales Market enables pre-trading of points, reflecting speculative demand.
2.2 Case Study: Friend.tech
- Model: Users bought "Keys" for exclusive content, earning points weekly.
- Challenges: Activity plummeted post-peak due to delayed features and restrictive airdrops (e.g., 90% locked behind new "Club" functionality).
- Outcome: V2 launch revived interest but failed to sustain 2023 transaction levels.
2.3 Case Study: EigenLayer
- TVL surge: $10B → $150B via LST integrations and third-party points farming.
Controversies:
- Non-transferable tokens initially.
- Only 5% of tokens airdropped in Season 1, excluding key regions.
- Community response: Additional 28M tokens distributed to address backlash.
2.4 Pros and Cons
| Stakeholder | Advantages | Risks |
|---|---|---|
| Users | Potential high rewards; broader participation | Low transparency; no guarantees |
| Protocols | Low-cost growth; flexible governance | Sustainability doubts; community backlash |
3. Conclusion
Points farming accelerates Web3 innovation but hinges on trust and value delivery. Protocols must balance incentives with sustainable features to retain users post-airdrop. Future applications could integrate points into loyalty systems—akin to airline miles—but only if communities perceive real utility.
👉 Explore more on Web3 incentives
FAQ Section
Q1: Are points farming rewards guaranteed?
A1: No. Rewards depend on protocol discretion, with no binding commitment to airdrops.
Q2: Why did EigenLayer face community criticism?
A2: Limited token transferability and exclusion of certain users from airdrops sparked dissent.
Q3: How can protocols ensure points farming sustainability?
A3: By aligning points with long-term utility (e.g., governance perks) and transparent communication.
👉 Dive deeper into blockchain strategies