The Impact of Interest Rate Hikes and Cuts on Cryptocurrencies

·

From an economic perspective, rising interest rates directly reduce market liquidity and indirectly lower investors' risk appetite, leading to market deleveraging and prolonged asset price declines. Conversely, interest rate cuts increase market liquidity, encouraging investors to pursue higher-risk investments, leverage more, and drive asset prices upward. The cryptocurrency market is no exception. This article examines Bitcoin's (BTC) performance across different monetary policy periods to illustrate how interest rate changes affect cryptocurrencies.


Federal Funds Rate: Historical Trends

While the Federal Funds Rate has experienced significant fluctuations historically, Bitcoin has been influenced primarily by three key periods since its inception:

  1. Gradual rate hikes (2015–2018)
  2. COVID-19-induced rate cuts (2019–2020)
  3. Aggressive rate hikes (2022–2023)

This analysis explores these periods in reverse chronological order for clarity.


2022–2023: Aggressive Rate Hikes

Federal Rate Hike Path vs. Bitcoin Trends

The recent rate hikes aimed to curb inflation spurred by COVID-19-era rate cuts. Prolonged low rates pushed U.S. CPI data to 9.1%, prompting rapid and substantial rate increases. The chart below highlights the timing (red arrows) and magnitude of hikes.

BTC Price Trends During Rate Hikes

Phase 1 (Nov 2021–Mar 2022):
After Fed Chair Powell signaled tightening policies akin to the Volcker era, BTC plummeted nearly 40% from its all-time high (~$69,000) to ~$40,000.

Phase 2 (Mar–Dec 2022):
The primary rate-hike phase saw BTC bottoming out. Despite multiple 75-basis-point hikes, price declines slowed, transitioning to volatile sideways trends.

Phase 3 (Dec 2022–Jul 2023):
With hikes tapering to 25 basis points, BTC rebounded as markets anticipated the end of tightening.

Key Insight:

Uncertainty before hikes triggered the sharpest volatility. Once hikes began, BTC’s decline decelerated even with large increases.


2019–2020: Rate Cuts Amid COVID-19

Rate Cut Path vs. Bitcoin Trends

Though framed as COVID-19 relief, these cuts primarily addressed macroeconomic weakness. Three phases emerged:

Phase 1 (Pre-Jul 2019):
The Fed’s announcement of potential cuts drove BTC from ~$4,000 to ~$10,000—despite no actual policy change.

Phase 2 (Jul–Oct 2019):
Three 25-basis-point cuts targeted economic softness. BTC corrected downward—a classic “sell the news” reaction.

Phase 3 (Mar 2020):
Emergency cuts (50 + 100 basis points) to salvage COVID-19-ravaged labor markets triggered BTC’s panic drop, then a swift rally to new highs.

Key Insight:

Expectations—not policy execution—drove BTC’s moves. Post-cut surges hinged on signals of prolonged loose policies.


Phase Summary

Reviewing both cycles reveals:

  1. Minor policy shifts have minimal market impact.
  2. Well-telegraphed Fed actions minimize disruptions.
  3. Pre-policy uncertainty fuels volatility.

2015–2018: Mild Rate Hikes

Rate Hike Path vs. BTC Trends

Strong labor markets and low inflation justified these hikes (0.125% → 2.375% over three years). The Fed’s clear communication and modest hikes prevented market declines.

Why No BTC Drop?


2024 Onward: Potential Rate-Cut Cycle Trends

CME’s Projected Rate-Cut Path

Current cuts aim to offset 2022–2023 hike impacts. CME data suggests:

BTC Implications:

Caveats:

BTC’s trajectory also hinges on ETFs, halvings, regulations, and sector trends—not just monetary policy.


FAQs

Q1: Why do rate hikes typically hurt BTC?
A: Higher rates reduce liquidity and risk appetite, pressuring speculative assets like BTC.

Q2: Do all rate cuts boost BTC?
A: No. Cuts must signal sustained loose policies—timing and expectations matter more than the act itself.

Q3: How did COVID-19 rate cuts differ from 2019’s?
A: 2020’s were larger (+100 bps) and tied to crisis response, fueling a sharper BTC rebound.

👉 Explore crypto trading strategies

👉 Master Bitcoin market cycles


Disclaimer: This analysis reflects historical patterns, not investment advice. Market risks apply.

Sources: CME Group, Federal Reserve, Gate.io Analytics.